Files
ThothII/harness/nsp/decisions.py
T
marcopan f104c015a1 feat(harness): SQL formula evidence -- concept->formula units + retrieval (D14b)
New evidence/formula_store.py: ConceptFormula (concept, columns, sql, status,
sources) as a frontmatter-YAML + SQL-body unit, stored one-file-per-formula under
<formulas>/<slug>-<n>.sql.md. save_formula is append-only (competing drafts and
reviewed versions coexist); retrieve_formula(concept) returns all of them so the
gate can surface candidates and let the reviewer choose.

concept_formula_approved / concept_formula_rejected added to DecisionType
(records the reviewer's choice; approved formulas travel with schema-linking).

L1: test_formula (7 tests) -- retrieval by concept, save/reload roundtrip (SQL
body preserved, frontmatter well-formed), multiple formulas per concept, empty
on no-match / missing dir, decision-type existence, default draft status.

Deferred: --kind formula on nsp search (needs search_cmd porting) wires
retrieve_formula into the CLI; lands with the search command.
2026-06-26 23:03:29 +02:00

95 lines
2.8 KiB
Python

from datetime import UTC, datetime
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Literal
from pydantic import BaseModel
DECISIONS_FILE = "review_decisions.jsonl"
# 22 tipi di ChironeWp3 (verified leggendo session/decisions.py) + 1 nuovo (D15):
# `decision_retracted` per il rollback a granularità step (ritira una decisione
# senza cancellarne la riga dal log di audit; effective_decisions la onora).
DecisionType = Literal[
"concept_clarified",
"question_rewritten",
"table_promoted",
"table_excluded",
"column_corrected",
"join_modified",
"evidence_accepted",
"evidence_rejected",
"ambiguity_open",
"memory_rejected",
"cte_approved",
"cte_corrected",
"cte_rejected",
"sql_revised",
"sql_approved",
"sql_rejected",
"phase_approved",
"phase_auto_approved",
"phase_reopened",
"phase_skipped",
"datamart_requested",
"datamart_declined",
# D15: marker di ritrazione. subject = "phase:N", retracts = decision_seq ritirata.
# Resta nel log di audit (append-only); effective_decisions() la esclude dalla vista.
"decision_retracted",
# D14a: valore citato nella domanda ancorato a una o piu' colonne. subject =
# "phase:4", detail = il valore (es. "ablazione"), rationale = la/e colonna/e scelta/e
# dal reviewer (aggregate_lsh_multi le espone tutte senza collassare al miglior match).
"value_grounded",
# D14b: formula di concetto approvata/rifiutata dal reviewer. subject = "phase:4",
# detail = il concetto (es. "fascia pediatrica"), rationale = la/e colonna/e o il motivo.
# retrieve_formula restituisce i candidati; queste decisioni registrano la scelta.
"concept_formula_approved",
"concept_formula_rejected",
]
class DecisionRecord(BaseModel):
seq: int
ts: datetime
type: DecisionType
subject: str
detail: str = ""
rationale: str = ""
# D15: se type == "decision_retracted", indica quale seq viene ritirata.
retracts: int | None = None
def list_decisions(session_dir: Path) -> list[DecisionRecord]:
path = session_dir / DECISIONS_FILE
if not path.exists():
return []
return [
DecisionRecord.model_validate_json(line)
for line in path.read_text().splitlines()
if line.strip()
]
def append_decision(
session_dir: Path,
*,
type: str,
subject: str,
detail: str = "",
rationale: str = "",
retracts: int | None = None,
) -> DecisionRecord:
record = DecisionRecord(
seq=len(list_decisions(session_dir)) + 1,
ts=datetime.now(UTC),
type=type,
subject=subject,
detail=detail,
rationale=rationale,
retracts=retracts,
)
path = session_dir / DECISIONS_FILE
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
with path.open("a") as f:
f.write(record.model_dump_json() + "\n")
return record