marcopan
292048f777
Due cambiamenti interconnessi da user review:
1. language come parametro workspace (spec decisione 9):
- Config.language (default 'en') + workspaces PSD con 'language: it'
- Generalizza Thoth oltre l'italiano: descrizioni tabelle/colonne ed evidence
sono nel workspace language; le istruzioni della skill restano in inglese
(piu' affidabili per modelli piccoli, meno ambigue)
2. Skill riscritta in INGLESE preservando la semantica COMPLETA dell'originale
(autocritica: la mia riscrittura precedente aveva perso ~10 vincoli precisi):
- 'promuovere' ambiguo (3 accezioni: phase advance / recommend / memory promote)
-> 'never advance a phase or record a decision without confirmation'
- recuperati vincoli persi: choice-is-confirmation (no reviewer_confirm dopo
reviewer_decide), reviewer_select SOLO per iterazione no-decision, messaggi
auto-contenuti obbligatori, artefatto = superficie di decisione (gate rilegge
da disco per CTE/SQL), candidati con provenienza+score non verita', opzione
'leave ambiguity open', F1 passa lista completa non solo ultima
- language contract esplicito (istruzioni EN, output nel workspace language)
Sottomoduli cte/memoria/rewriting/sql-generation in inglese, semantica tecnica
intatta (regole AV-SQL, dim_time trick, max 5 memorie solo 3 tipi riusabili).
Verifica: 0 residui nsp/chirone, tutti i tht <cmd> citati registrati, 165 passed.
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
Question rewriting technique
Adapted from the "rephrase question" step of AV-SQL: decompose the question into explicit conditions, without losing information.
The rewritten question must:
- Make the population explicit (who/what is counted or selected) using the data model's terms (e.g. "distinct patients in dim_patient").
- Make every condition an explicit, numbered clause: time window, included/excluded events, thresholds, states.
- Replace ambiguous terms with the concepts clarified in Phase 1, citing the evidence that defines them when it exists (evidence id in parentheses).
- Make the expected output explicit: count, list, aggregate, trend.
- Stay in the workspace language, in a form a second reviewer would understand without having seen the conversation.
Format of the proposal to the reviewer:
Rewritten question: Conditions: 1) ... 2) ... 3) ... Assumptions used: Expected output:
Iterate based on corrections. Do not proceed to Phase 4 without confirmation.