Validation
Trusting the text is a process, not a promise
-
-
- - Quality gates — ≥95% procedure classification, ≥85% pathology detection, validated on 100 manually reviewed records
- - Clinical review — the extracted Brugada cohort was validated by clinicians on Superset dashboards
- - Feedback loop — ~893 Brugada false positives found and removed in pattern-library v1.3.1
- - Nothing is silently dropped — negated and family-attributed findings are stored too, filtered only at the mart layer
-
-
Quality gateAn extraction is accepted only after 100 manual reviews confirm the agreed accuracy — the same standard for every new pattern release.
+
+
+
+
01Quality gates — ≥95% procedure classification, ≥85% pathology detection, validated on 100 manually reviewed records
+
02Clinical review — the extracted Brugada cohort was validated by clinicians on Superset dashboards
+
03Feedback loop — ~893 Brugada false positives found and removed in pattern-library v1.3.1
+
04Nothing is silently dropped — negated and family-attributed findings are stored too, filtered only at the mart layer
+
+
Quality gateAn extraction is accepted only after 100 manual reviews confirm the agreed accuracy — the same standard for every new pattern release.
+
+
+
The advantage: speed, precision, determinism
+
01Machine speedtwenty years of letters are read by rules, not by hand; when a pattern improves, the whole archive is rebuilt from the letters themselves
+
02Audited precisionevery release clears the same gate before production: ≥95% procedure classification, ≥85% pathology detection
+
03Deterministic by designthe same letter always yields the same values: no LLM sampling, no randomness, every result traceable to a versioned pattern
+
+